By Fnf Correspondent | PUBLISHED: 24, Jan 2025, 12:52 pm IST | UPDATED: 24, Jan 2025, 12:52 pm IST
Where were the lawyers when the executive order was signed?" the judge questioned, expressing disbelief. He said it ‘boggled’ his mind that any lawyer would argue the order was constitutional.
The Democratic-led states are pursuing a temporary restraining order, claiming the executive order violates the 14th Amendment. Trump’s executive order instructed US agencies to deny citizenship to children born in the US if neither parent is a citizen or legal permanent resident.
Lane Polozola, representing the state of Washington, argued before the court that ‘births cannot be paused’ as the legal challenge unfolds, highlighting the immediate uncertainty surrounding the citizenship of newborns.
Polozola emphasised that more than 150,000 children could be denied citizenship annually if the executive order is enforced, leading to ‘long-term substantial negative impacts’ on their lives.
He further accused the Trump administration of overlooking these harms in its filings, suggesting that the potential harm ‘appears to be the purpose’ of the order.
(With agency inputs)
by : Priti Prakash
Imagine a nation that waits to be split apart as if to be shared amongst the winners as the spoils o...